This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1892 edition. Excerpt: ...the fact that the press and the campaign orators of the party, spite of resolution and speech, recommended Douglas as the most deserving battler for freedom, was a symptom to be greeted with joy. It was, of course, greatly to be lamented that so bold an untruth could be defended with such success; but that so bold an untruth had to be resorted to to keep the masses from marching off into the enemy's camp threw a flood of light on the fact that the poisoning of the thought and feeling of the masses could go no further. The hypocrisy and dishonesty of the leaders furnished a measure of the moral reaction that must have set in among a DOUGLAS EEFUTES HIMSELF. 227 large portion of their followers. But Douglas had allowed himself to be misled by his rage over what had been done in Charleston into another act of imprudence, by which he imputed still greater hypocrisy and dishonesty to those leaders. Even before he was nominated in Baltimore he had himself most brilliantly refuted what they had now to say of his services in the cause of freedom, in order to make their old and trusted followers stand by his flag. In a speech of the 16th of Hay he had in a tone of the greatest indignation upbraided the slavocracy for their shameful ingratitude. They had asked only for the continuation of the Missouri line and were not able to get it; but he had obtained for them, by his doctrine of non-intervention, much more than they had demanded. To that doctrine alone did they owe it that New Mexico had introduced and protected slavery. Where, outside of New Mexico and Arizona, had an inch of free territory been changed into slave territory since the days of the Revolution? Nonintervention and popular sovereignty alone had brought it to pass that a degree and...