Effects of Surface-Modified Titanium Implants on Osseointegration in Irradiated Bone

Effects of Surface-Modified Titanium Implants on Osseointegration in Irradiated Bone
Author: Junyuan Li
Publisher: Open Dissertation Press
Total Pages:
Release: 2017-01-27
Genre:
ISBN: 9781361385210

Download Effects of Surface-Modified Titanium Implants on Osseointegration in Irradiated Bone Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

This dissertation, "Effects of Surface-modified Titanium Implants on Osseointegration in Irradiated Bone" by Junyuan, Li, 黎俊媛, was obtained from The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong) and is being sold pursuant to Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License. The content of this dissertation has not been altered in any way. We have altered the formatting in order to facilitate the ease of printing and reading of the dissertation. All rights not granted by the above license are retained by the author. Abstract: Radiotherapy is a common treatment for head and neck cancers. However, it compromises bone healing. Titanium implanthas been shown to be a predictable method for replacing missing teeth. Clinical studies revealed that implant failure rate in irradiated regionwas high. Many studies showed that modifications of implant surface could enhance implant osseointegration by improving cell attachment, cell growth and bone formation. Nevertheless, there were few studies investigating the effect of implant surface modification on osseointegration in irradiated bone. In the first experiment, the effect of fluoride-modified (FM) titanium surface on irradiated osteoblast attachment was assessed. The morphology and chemical composition of FM surface was assessed by SEM, AFM and XPS. Osteoblasts received 0Gy, 2Gy, 4Gy, 6Gy, 8Gy, 10Gy radiation. Cell number, fluorescence intensity and cell area of irradiated osteoblasts were assessed. The number of osteoblasts onFM surface was fewer than those on NF surface after 0Gy, 2Gy, 8Gy and 10Gy radiation. Cell area of osteoblasts on FM surface was less at 2Gy radiation but larger at 6Gy radiation than on NF surface. The fluorescence intensity of osteoblasts was also higher on NF surface than on FM surface after receiving 0Gy, 2Gy, 4Gy, 10Gy radiation. In the second experiment, an animal model was established to study the effect of radiation on osseointegration. Rabbits were divided into 15Gy and 30Gy radiation groups. Only the left leg was exposed to radiation, and the right leg was protected from radiation. Totally, 24 implants were inserted. Implant stability quotient (ISQ), bone volume to total volume (BV/TV), bone-to-implant contact (BIC), and bone growth rate were measured. After 15Gy and 30Gy of radiation, ISQ and BV/TV were significantly reduced. At week 3, 15Gy radiation group displayed slower bone growth rate comparing with the control side. Fluorochrome results showed that the 30Gy radiation side had a significantly slower apposition of new bone.In addition, BIC on30Gy radiation side was notablypoorer than that on 15Gy radiation side and on 30Gy control side. Based on the animal model, the third experiment investigated effects of calcium phosphate nanocrystals on implant osseointegration in irradiated bone. Titanium implants treated with nano-scale calcium phosphate (CaP) crystals served as the test group while ones with dual acid-etching only served as the control group. The left leg of rabbits received 15Gy radiation and implants were placed in the irradiated leg. Significant higher ISQ was detected in the nano-CaP group at week 12. The bone growth rate in nano-CaP group was more than doubled than the control group at both week 6 and week 9. The fourth experiment evaluated artifacts on micro-CT images caused by titanium dental implant. Implants were assigned into four groups: (1) implant only; (2) implant with covering screw; (3) implant with resin embedding; and (4) implant with covering screw and resin embedding. Each implant was scanned by micro-CT at 3 angulations. Implant angulation was the most determining factor followed by resin embedding. Minimal metallic artifacts were obtainedin non-embedded implants with its axis paralleling to X-ray. DOI: 10.5353/th_b5312315 Subjects: Osseointegration Dental implants

The Impact of Different Dental Implant Surface Properties to Osseointegration Success of Dental Implants- A Systematic Review

The Impact of Different Dental Implant Surface Properties to Osseointegration Success of Dental Implants- A Systematic Review
Author: Mustafa Hayati Atala
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2017
Genre:
ISBN:

Download The Impact of Different Dental Implant Surface Properties to Osseointegration Success of Dental Implants- A Systematic Review Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

Background: Osseointegration of dental implants can be considered as the main factor for successful implant stability. This healing process can be related with the surface of dental implants because the surface properties of dental implants affect bone apposition and cell responses. Dental implants have hybrid nature consisting of: implant body which is intrabony part, implant neck which contact with soft tissue and the last part interact with oral environment. So, dental implants have several interfaces and there is a challenge between bacterial colonization and cell functional integration of the dental implant surfaces. Various surface modifying methods such as blasting,etching, anodizing or coating with biomaterials are introduced. Surface modifications of dental implants is one of the most widely researched fields of implant dentistry. These surface modifications improve the adsorbtion of protein, cells and so result in faster osseointegration. However, no reports have demonstrated the superiority of one surface treatment over the other. Aim/Hypothesis: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical success of different implant surface properties and acquire actual results.Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed search form). The study is based on the Cochrane Review Methods. The main question is u2018Which implant surface modification technique is best in terms of clinical outcomes?u2019 In last decades (from January 2008 to December 2018), published clinical studies on implants with different surface properties were independently evaluated two reviewers (K.D. and M.H.A.) based on the inclusion criteria. In vitro studies, animal studies, retrospective studies, non-comparative studies and case reports were excluded. (1) Comparative clinical studies of different implant surfaces reporting one year or longer follow-up period, (2) more than ten patients including studies and (3) articles to consider mean marginal bone loss result were included.Results: A total of 2604 articles were evaluated from database. 110 articles is repeated, 2357 articles are animal studies and cell studies, 137 articles not relevant outcomes, 21 clinical studies were evaluated. 3 studies excluded because follow-up smaller than 1 year. Remaining 18 studies met the inclusion criteria and included to the review (Table 1). The modification methods were classified as physically, chemically or biochemically treated. Generally implant failure was related with smoking habit. Because of the low number of studies assesing each surface modification for failure, annual failure rates were not measured by surface modification technique. u0130mplant success were favorable for all modification techniques, but chemically and biochemically modification procedures can improve osseointegration at initial stage.Conclusions and Clinical u0130mplications: Within the limitation of this systematic review, it can be concluded that biochemical and chemical techniques can accelerate osseointegration process and may be prefered for early loading planning. However, the studies have different methods and it is difficult to figure out scientifically that superiority of one surface modification technique over another. Further comparative and long term clinical studies are required to identify exact results about the surface modification techniques.

Coated Implant Surfaces

Coated Implant Surfaces
Author: Petra M. Dorfner
Publisher: Sudwestdeutscher Verlag Fur Hochschulschriften AG
Total Pages: 140
Release: 2012
Genre:
ISBN: 9783838135106

Download Coated Implant Surfaces Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

A profound knowledge of bony in growth is the basis for the development of biofunctionalized implants. The positive influence of RGD peptides and surface properties of implant material on cell adhesion is well known. With the aim to reveal potential synergies, we functionalized different Ti6Al4V disks with highly active v-specific RGD peptides. Our integrin binding studies yielded the most promising results for the combination of peptide coating and rough surfaces. Cell adhesion experiments performed with characterized human primary osteoblasts demonstrated that cells adhere more strongly on rough surfaces coated with peptide compared to smooth ones. We showed that peptide coating and surface topography influence the adhesion kinetics particularly at the early stage. Cell spreading was accelerated on Ti6Al4V disks immobilized with peptides within the first hour, while after longer incubation times this effect is less pronounced. The combination of RGD peptide coating with optimized topological surface properties of implant materials bears the potential to increase osseointegration."

Effect of Resveratrol and Implant Surface Topography on Osseointegration Under Hyperglycemic Conditions

Effect of Resveratrol and Implant Surface Topography on Osseointegration Under Hyperglycemic Conditions
Author: Anthony Joseph Staibano
Publisher:
Total Pages: 0
Release: 2021
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Effect of Resveratrol and Implant Surface Topography on Osseointegration Under Hyperglycemic Conditions Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

Chronic hyperglycemia compromises bone structure and may contribute to dental implant failures. Previous studies show that topographically complex implant surfaces enhance bone-implant anchorage compromised by hyperglycemia. Furthermore, resveratrol (RSV) is a potent antioxidant that counteracts the effects of hyperglycemia. The influence of two implant surface profiles (micro- and nanotopographically complex) and RSV administration on osseointegration in hyperglycemic bone was investigated. 240 custom-designed threaded implants were inserted in the proximal tibiae of 120 hyperglycemic Wistar rats. Rats were randomized to receiving weekly subcutaneous resveratrol or propylene glycol injections for a maximum of 4 weeks. Implants then underwent reverse-torque mechanical testing at timepoints between 5 and 84 days. Nanotopographic implants significantly enhanced bone-implant anchorage during implant osseointegration, which transpires within 28 days post-implantation, while resveratrol significantly increased bone-implant anchorage at 84 days, indicating an effect on bone remodelling. This likely occurred due to an influence of RSV on tibial longitudinal growth.

Influence of the Titanium Dental Implants Surfaces on Viability of Osteoblast-like Cells

Influence of the Titanium Dental Implants Surfaces on Viability of Osteoblast-like Cells
Author: Oliveira Natacha Kalline
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2017
Genre:
ISBN:

Download Influence of the Titanium Dental Implants Surfaces on Viability of Osteoblast-like Cells Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

Osseointegration was defined as a structural and functional connection between a living tissue-bone and the surface of an implant subjected to a functional load. One of the current chalenges of osseointegration is the development of a titanium implant surface that could accelerate or improve osseointegration process. Strategies to achieve this issue include adjustments in surface characteristics like roughness, chemical composition, superficial energy and hydrophilicity that can affect cell behavior in bone-implant interface.The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the response of osteoblast-like cells grown to four different dental implant surfaces.Four different dental implant surfaces were tested: sandblasted with acid-etched and calcium phosphates coating (AAMB); doubleacid-etched (SW); acid-etched (MP), and anodized (VA). Osteoblast-like cells (Osteo 1) were seeded on the top of these implantsurfaces (5x104 cells/implant). The viability of the cells was assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours later, using the MTT reduction assay.The distribution and morhology of the cells was observed in scanning eletron micrographs. Experiments were carried out in triplicate. The cell viability was similar during whole experimental times in all surfaces, except by the double acid-etched surface. At 72 hoursafter plating cells grown on the top of the SW surface presented the lowest viability (p = 0.03). Most surface area was covered by thecells, which exhibited the classical poligonal and filipopia-rich osteoblat-like morphology in all surfaces, except in the SW surface. Thissurface was mostly devoid of cells, which were elongated with a flat interface with the implant surface.The double acid-etching treatment of dental implant surfaces creates a morphlogy that impairs the intimate interface with culturedosteoblast-like cells. This could have a negative impact in the osseointegration process in vivo.

The Comparison of Dental Implant Surfaces and Their Effect on Osseointegration in the Aesthetic Zone + Clinical and Radiographic Case Report

The Comparison of Dental Implant Surfaces and Their Effect on Osseointegration in the Aesthetic Zone + Clinical and Radiographic Case Report
Author: Gozlu Muammer
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2017
Genre:
ISBN:

Download The Comparison of Dental Implant Surfaces and Their Effect on Osseointegration in the Aesthetic Zone + Clinical and Radiographic Case Report Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

The comparison of dental implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration in the aesthetic zone ; Clinical and Radiographic case reportBackground: Recent studies have encouraged a progressive shortening of the healing period for single-tooth implants and immediate loading has been proposed for the aesthetic zone in the maxilla. The biological fixation between the dental implant surfaces and jaw bones should be considered a prerequisite for the long-term success of implant-supported prostheses.Aim/Hypothesis : The aim of this case is to compare the effectiveness of immediate single implants with different surface in the aesthetic zone.Materials and Methods : Patients requiring a single tooth implant-supported restoration in the maxillary esthetic zone received the implant with rough surface and combine surface (rough surface + machined surface) placed in healed sites. The combine implant surfaces is also called hybrid implant. Implants that achieved an insertion torque of at least 35 Ncm were immediately non-occlusally loaded. The screw-retained provisional crown was delivered within 7 hours following the surgery and non functionally loaded. The definitive prosthesis was delivered within 2 months after implant insertion. Two months later the osteointegration progress was evaluated in all installed implants using: Dental X-rays and Osstellu2122 system.Results : After two months period of healing, high level of integration was observed. The stability of these implants was measured using Osstellu2122 system. These implants showed higher values ; ISQ 75 (hybrid) and 76 (rough surface), respectively. It also observed a good soft tissue adaptation clinically. No complications were observed. Radiographic bone changes were similar in both dental implants.Conclusions and Clinical implications :Both implants is a valuable treatment option for immediate implant placement and loading of single crowns in the maxillary esthetic zone.