Comparative Judicial Behavior

Comparative Judicial Behavior
Author: Glendon A. Schubert
Publisher:
Total Pages: 448
Release: 1969
Genre: Judges
ISBN:

Download Comparative Judicial Behavior Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior

The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior
Author: Lee Epstein
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Total Pages: 101
Release: 2021-06-17
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 1009058738

Download The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

The past decade has witnessed a worldwide explosion of work aimed at illuminating judicial-behavior: the choices judges make and the consequences of their choices. We focus on strategic accounts of judicial-behavior. As in other approaches to judging, preferences and institutions play a central role but strategic accounts are unique in one important respect: They draw attention to the interdependent - i.e., the strategic - nature of judicial decisions. On strategic accounts, judges do not make decisions in a vacuum, but rather attend to the preferences and likely actions of other actors, including their colleagues, superiors, politicians, and the public. We survey the major methodological approaches for conducting strategic analysis and consider how scholars have used them to provide insight into the effect of internal and external actors on the judges' choices. As far as these studies have traveled in illuminating judicial-behavior, many opportunities for forward movement remain. We flag four in the conclusion.

Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior

Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior
Author: Robert M. Howard
Publisher: Routledge
Total Pages: 518
Release: 2017-10-02
Genre: Political Science
ISBN: 1317430387

Download Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

Interest in social science and empirical analyses of law, courts and specifically the politics of judges has never been higher or more salient. Consequently, there is a strong need for theoretical work on the research that focuses on courts, judges and the judicial process. The Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior provides the most up to date examination of scholarship across the entire spectrum of judicial politics and behavior, written by a combination of currently prominent scholars and the emergent next generation of researchers. Unlike almost all other volumes, this Handbook examines judicial behavior from both an American and Comparative perspective. Part 1 provides a broad overview of the dominant Theoretical and Methodological perspectives used to examine and understand judicial behavior, Part 2 offers an in-depth analysis of the various current scholarly areas examining the U.S. Supreme Court, Part 3 moves from the Supreme Court to examining other U.S. federal and state courts, and Part 4 presents a comprehensive overview of Comparative Judicial Politics and Transnational Courts. Each author in this volume provides perspectives on the most current methodological and substantive approaches in their respective areas, along with suggestions for future research. The chapters contained within will generate additional scholarly and public interest by focusing on topics most salient to the academic, legal and policy communities.

Comparative Judicial Systems

Comparative Judicial Systems
Author: John R. Schmidhauser
Publisher: Elsevier
Total Pages: 256
Release: 2013-10-22
Genre: Law
ISBN: 148310060X

Download Comparative Judicial Systems Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

Comparative Judicial Systems: Challenging Frontiers in Conceptual and Empirical Analysis is a comprehensive and cohesive collection of investigative essays written by significant contributors in the field of comparative judicial institutions and politics. These essays seek to explain the judicial systems of different nations and analyze their implications. The book is divided into three parts. Part I deals with the integration of courts into the study of politics and conceptual frameworks in comparative cross-national legal and judicial research. Part II covers analyses of the judicial systems of a certain nation, while Part III compares and analyzes judicial systems of different nations as well as their judicial background in relation to their subculture. The text is recommended for lawyers as well as those in the field of political science and in the judicial branch, especially those who are looking to countries as examples for the improvement of their local systems.

The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior

The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior
Author: Lee Epstein
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Total Pages: 625
Release: 2017
Genre: Law
ISBN: 019957989X

Download The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior offers readers a comprehensive introduction and analysis of research regarding decision making by judges serving on federal and state courts in the U.S. Featuring contributions from leading scholars in the field, the Handbook describes and explains how the courts' political and social context, formal institutional structures, and informal norms affect judicial decision making. The Handbook also explores the impact of judges' personal attributes and preferences, as well as prevailing legal doctrine, influence, and shape case outcomes in state and federal courts. The volume also proposes avenues for future research in the various topics addressed throughout the book. Consultant Editor for The Oxford Handbooks of American Politics George C. Edwards III.

Comparative Judicial Politics

Comparative Judicial Politics
Author: Theodore Lewis Becker
Publisher: Chicago : Rand McNally
Total Pages: 438
Release: 1970
Genre: Courts
ISBN:

Download Comparative Judicial Politics Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

Judicial Reputation

Judicial Reputation
Author: Nuno Garoupa
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Total Pages: 286
Release: 2015-11-20
Genre: Law
ISBN: 022629059X

Download Judicial Reputation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

In "Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory, "Tom Ginsburg and Nuno Garoupa mean to explain how judges respond to the reputational incentives provided by the different audiences they interact with--lawyers and law professors; politicians; the media; and the public itself--as well as how legal systems design their judicial institutions to calibrate the locally appropriate balance among audiences. Making use by turns of careful empirical work and penetrating conceptual insights, Ginsburg and Garoupa argue that any given judicial structure is best understood not through the lens of legal culture, origin, or tradition, but through the economics of information and reputation.